The age limit ruling and the peak of political posturing in Uganda

I have followed the discussions around the Age-Limit ruling with keen interest.  I have also read the thoughts of President Yoweri Museveni on the same.

Given the political context of Uganda, last week’s Constitution Court decision was easily predictable.  It was not surprising that the Court delivered a verdict in favor of lifting the age limits for presidential candidates.  The mere fact that even mama mboga down the street could have predicted (with precision) the ruling, it tells a lot about the Country’s judicial system as well as the existent pulls and pressures at play.  At the heart of the perceptions around the ruling is the sense that the Court could not have ruled differently given the circumstances and political context.

The age limit ruling in Mbale was more of political than legal.  Politically, the majority of Parliamentarians that voted for the removal of age limits were ‘thrown under the bus’ by the benefactor and sole beneficiary of the age limit amendment Act.

I hope last week's events rudely awaken the consciousness of Parliamentarians to understand for whom and with whom they legislate.  If there was any invisible, it is slowly but surely becoming visible. If there was any iota of doubt, it is now gone; the veil is lifting.

The judgment in many respects inadvertently overturned the presumed multi-party democratic political system and reset the country to individualistic political practices.

Court’s interpretation of the law and the processes towards the 'Age Limit' amendment paid special focus on the individual of the president. The fear to hurt the interests of President Museveni could have affected the objectivity of the Court’s conclusions.

Looking at how some of the Constitution Court judges justified aspects such as the military attack on Parliament, the inadequate consultations (on the 'Age Limit' bill), it was clear that elements of ‘rule of law’ can now be subject to negotiation; truths can be evidenced with alternative facts; and belief systems can now be fashioned to provide legal and political legitimacy whenever need arises.

The ruling has unquestionably created a tension between democracy and aspects of judicial review.  Democracy should be in form and substance, and not in mere historicizing and posturing.  Citizens should be, and should feel represented across the entire spectrum of government.

The effects of the judgment will be far-reaching. The ruling was a nod to self-styled ‘rule for life’.  Although the judgment of the Constitutional Court is legal – for now, it remains largely inconsistent with legitimate expectations and may continue to face legitimacy problems.

There is, unfortunately, no quick fix to the current trend of things.  What we are seeing at the moment is akin to a grand political project that is determined to manipulate the strict etiquette of rule of law; a project that is resolved to obliterate functional institutions and their independence; and a scheme that exclusively emboldens a self-perpetuating attitude over broad citizen interests.


In the face of a tide to perpetuate individual and self, over state and nation, the urgent need for a genuine, united citizens’ ‘movement’ to change the trajectory that Uganda is taking cannot be underestimated. I am talking about a ‘movement’ that transcends politics and partisan identities; and organizes around issues and causes that affect Ugandans, Africans and humanity – broadly.  I am speaking about a ‘movement’ that includes rather than excludes; a ‘movement’ that unites and not divides.  I am referring to a ‘movement’ that does not demonize its followers rather one that seeks to rally common-cause around issues of broad interest; a ‘movement’ that ‘lives’ rather than ‘leaves’ the ideals of pan-Africanism, patriotism, democracy etc.



It is that 'movement' that will capture the imagination and hearts of the people and sail the Country through the un-usual political times before us.

Again, we must remember that, it was Ugandans in the first place who changed the course of Uganda and not just government or institutions of the state. Only Ugandans can change Uganda – not entirely Courts of law.

For God and my Country.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Loss of confidence in the Ugandan government Institutions; where is the hope for the common citizen?

Lately, my colleague and Political analyst, Gwada Ogot has engaged me in serious discussions on the degenerating trust and confidence in public institutions representative of democracy not only in Uganda but in many of the post 1950 new states.   In Uganda specifically, the past and current political developments undertone citizen’ dissatisfaction with, and lack of confidence in, the functioning of most government institutions.   Prior to the 2011 general elections, sections of society rejected the composition of the Electoral Commission (EC).   These sections of the public branded the Commission as an incompetent, partisan institution and highlighted it as incapable of presiding over a credible and fair election hence passing a vote of no confidence in it as an electoral institution.    At the peak echelon of political activity, the opposition’s indifference on the election results of the February 18 th , Presidential elections and the subsequent move by th...
Read more

Dialogue should have been the first resort to resolve Uganda's current problems

President Museveni’s call for political dialogue with the opposition party’ leaders which hit the headlines of most local Ugandan media outlets this week reminded me of Winston Churchill’s famous quote: " Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing...after they have exhausted all other possibilities ."  Putting this in perspective, Ugandans too can always be counted on to do the right thing after they have exhausted all other possibilities.   When the opposition decided to go to the 2011 polls, the initial mood was greeted with the feeling that all opposition political parties were going to field a single candidate under the Inter-Party Cooperation (IPC). Essentially, this would have been one of the wittiest ways that the opposition would have strengthened its competitive position for the 2011 elections.  As seen in some countries such as Kenya, a broad spectrum of opposition groups have adopted the initiative of coalitions by forming a common front ...
Read more

CCTV Cameras? Our neighbourhood structures can do a better job!

In the village where I was raised in mid-western Uganda was a functional Resistance Council (RC), which later mutated into a Local Council (LC) with the adoption of the 1995 Constitution.   One of the members of the executive that has for a very long time stuck on my mind was the secretary for defence; he was called Mr. Boniface Byaruhanga.   This was not an era of mobile phones, but for lack of a fair expression, I will say, everyone on the village had Byaruhanga on their speed dial. Because of his active service, he was later to be commonly known as “Byaruhanga Defence”.   He did a super amazing job! God rest his soul in eternal peace.   This man generally kept the village defended and safe.   He outwitted petty thieves, burglars and any form of criminals. For some reason, he knew everyone on the village; a village that sheltered slightly over 800 folks.   We felt safe even on those days when we occasionally walked through the thick tree-lined avenues...
Read more