This is why the Registration of Persons Biil, 2014 must be passed urgently
If there is one
exercise in Uganda’s electoral cycle that has always bred contestation around
elections and election outcome, it is the process of compiling or updating the national
voter register. Many times, this contestation has been because of the insufficient
time and attention allocated to the making and/or cleaning the voters’ register. We can trace this as far back as in the
processes leading up to the1996 general elections.
According to the EC’s
Strategic Plan 2013-2017, the general update of the voters register at parish
level was scheduled to commence in September this year – this is yet to begin.
Many times, questions
around the independence and impartiality of the EC have been linked directly to
the Commission’s actions and inactions in failing to address the problems
related to voter registration.
In 2001, there were
questions around the incredibly high number of voters on the national voters
register; out of Uganda’s 22 million people, 11.6 million were on the register
– a number that cast doubt on the credibility of the register at that time. Worse still, in that election cycle, only
twelve days had been allocated to the registration of new persons; a period
that scores felt was too short.
Likewise in 2006, a
duplicate analysis conducted by the Electoral Commission itself revealed a
number of duplicate voters on the register.
In both 2006 and 2011, there continued to be many claims around
impostors voting in the names of the dead and absentee voters. Today, such
inconsistency in the national voters’ register continues to rear its ugly head
especially during by-elections with many being disenfranchised.
Going back to previous
electoral cycles, one single common feature that is consistent with past
elections is how voter registration/register update and scrutiny processes have
always been last-minute work. Prior to
the 2011 general elections, registration of new voters was conducted hardly nine
months to the polls. Relatedly, similar complaints
about not having sufficient time to examine the national voters register were restated
from all corners of the electorate. Subsequently, the 2011 voters register yet
again turned out to be a key controversial aspect of the 2011 elections – with
claims that ‘old’ registers had been merged with a new one to come up with the
register that was used for the February 2011 poll. Actually there still remains uncertainty over
which register or registers were used in that election.
Two years to the 2016
elections, a very fundamental process that would contribute to a new
(potentially) reliable voters register is being undertaken – the registration
of Ugandan citizens under the on-going ‘national ID registration exercise’. As reports have it, this time round, the
voters register for subsequent elections (beginning with the 2016 election) is
going to be extracted from the national ID database – a development which
should possibly weed out longstanding problems around the national voters
register. It is with pleasure that the foundational process (‘national ID
registration’) has been conducted well in time.
However there is one thing we must note; that for the EC to be able to
extract and use the returns from the national ID database, there has to be an
enabling law to back the process – short of which the EC would have to
undertake fresh processes to compile a register especially in respect to
2016. Of course as many have argued,
undertaking fresh processes to register voters across the country less than a
year to the next general election would yet again be the usual last-minute
‘quick fix’ work that would not purge the previous numerous voter registration
problems.
A couple of weeks ago,
we heard of the Registration of Persons Bill, 2014 being brought to
parliament. Beyond seeking to harmonise
and consolidate the law on registration of persons in Uganda, this new Bill will
also make provisions on how other government institutions and agencies such as
the Electoral Commission will benefit from persons’ data collected under the ‘national
ID registration’ exercise.
While this law will
benefit many other entities, it is very critical that the Bill is considered
and passed urgently in order to offer that legally required elbowroom for the
EC to use the national ID data in the compilation of the 2016 voters register. Obviously, for the EC, drawing from the
national ID database will make the process of compilation of the voter register
much more easier, cost effective and should ideally allow for more time to
verify voters’ data. This would may be
not be the case if the EC hit the field afresh to collect electorate’s data
from scratch at this material time.
One caveat however,
when the Registration of Persons Bill, 2014 takes effect and the EC extracts
data from the national ID database, it must subject the ‘draft’ voters register
to rigorous public scrutiny in order to weed out any inconsistences that have
bogged down previous voters registers.
What we do not want
this time round is last-minute voter register compilation that has previously
resulted into collaged voters registers. Now, the ball to pass this important
and urgent law is in the very parliamentarians who first and foremost (I think)
are interested in a cleaner, transparent, credible and timely national voters
register – either because many of them will run again as candidates come 2016 or
because all of them are voters and most-importantly, ‘well-meaning’ citizens of
this country.
With those few words,
let me join the rest of the Ugandans to urge Parliament to quickly look into
and pass the Registration of Persons Bill, 2014 for the benefit of a cleaner,
transparent and credible voters register ahead of 2016.
Comments
Post a Comment